Shank 2: Teaching a Class in Advanced Sequel Making


I never got around to reviewing the original Shank.  It came out to somewhat mixed reviews, and that coupled with a price point on the high end of the downloadable game scale kept me away.  I eventually bought it on sale, however, and immediately regretted my decision to wait.  Somehow Shank‘s developers, Klei, had distilled everything I loved into one glorious revenge-fueled brawler.  It was like Metal Slug with a much more elaborate combat system, fused with an amazing unmade Robert Rodriguez film.  With my backlog, playing through a game twice is pretty rare these days, and I have completely lost track of the times I replayed Shank, whether front to back or just an individual level here and there.  The game never seemed to inspire much talk around the Internet though, so when a sequel sprang up seemingly out of nowhere I was more than pleasantly surprised.  As a bonus, Shank 2 released at a lower price point than the original, at $10 or 800 Microsoft Space Bucks (the price of the original has also been lowered to match, go buy it!).  I jumped on it day one but a series of computer issues prevented me from doing a review.  Well, no longer!  How does the sequel hold up against the original?  Read on and find out!

Simply put, Shank 2 is a sequel done right.  The dedicated team at Klei completely stripped down the original game, got rid of what didn’t work, improved what did, and reassembled it into one of the most incredible and streamlined brawlers I’ve ever played.  Brutal counterattacks and a lifesaving dodge move conveniently mapped to the right thumbstick elevate the combat, at its best moments, to the level of a 2D Arkham City.  That is, if Batman ended his combo strings by eviscerating a thug with his own machine gun. Did I mention that the counterattacks are brutal?  The controls have been subtly remapped since the original, and the button choices are perfect and intuitive.  Once you get them down about halfway through the first level, Shank becomes an absolute whirlwind of blades and bullets.  The only thing I miss is the ability to cycle through weapons on the fly-you now have to pause the game to make any changes.  I feel like that’s a fair trade for a smoother combat experience, and with four different weapons equipped at a time anyway, it’s unlikely you’ll ever feel a serious need to visit the loadout screen mid-fight.

I don't think it's supposed to bend that way.

The narrative in Shank 2 is sparse even by the standards of the original (revennnnge!), but I never hit a point in the game where that felt like it mattered.  The cutscenes are entertaining, the characters colorful, and the story at least holds its own with “Wrestler Mayor’s Daughter Abducted” or “President Kidnapped By Ninjas”.  And that, my friends, is all a good brawler needs in that department.  Game length is also pretty substantial for genre standards, clocking in at around 4-5 hours depending on difficulty settings and skill level.  The meta-game here is also pretty decent, with a few collectibles to hunt down and a wide variety of goals to earn both achievements and extra costumes or characters.  Many of these will require a few playthroughs to get, but with goals like “Stomp X number of baseball bats down throats”, it’s more of a pleasure cruise than a grind.

I think we'll be okay, as long as the enemies don't grow increasingly numerous and/or more difficult!

Shank featured a co-op campaign with a unique story that took place before the single player, which I always felt was a pretty cool idea, even though it lacked an online option.  The good news is that the co-op in Shank 2 features both local and online play.  The bad news is that ever since Gears of War 2 the “Horde Mode = Great Success” mentality has been on the rise, and it’s becoming the go-to multiplayer option for genres across the board.  Don’t get me wrong, horde mode is alright in most games.  And it’s well-implemented here, with a wide variety of playable characters each featuring a unique skillset.  I just wish it were an extra feature instead of a flat-out replacement for the campaign-based multiplayer, and that so many publishers cough EA cough weren’t mandating it for every title.

In my (correct) opinion, the Shank series is a paragon of its genre.  If there’s another single-player focused brawler out there with more satisfying combat and aesthetics, I haven’t found it.  If plowing through endless enemies with a flurry of chainsaws, machetes, and shotgun shells is at all appealing to you, you should absolutely play both of these games.  If you haven’t already played the original though, by all means play it before Shank 2.  I don’t want to say the first Shank isn’t worth playing, because it is, but the sequel is so much better that it’s hard to go back.  For taking a game I loved and improving on it in ways that only the most dedicated developers can, I declare Shank 2 one of my favorite downloadable titles of all time, and add that Klei, if you guys aren’t, you know, doing anything later, maybe you’d like to go get some coffee or something?


Availability: Xbox Live Arcade, PlayStation Network, Steam

Price: $10 (800 spacebucks on the Xbox)

Co-Op: Online and Local Horde Mode

Awesomeness Level: Totally Awesome 


About Ryan Searles

I like watching movies, and then talking about those movies. Sometimes I write things about them, which you should read. Other interests include boxed wine, video games, the works of Harlan Ellison and HG Wells, and being a general curmudgeon.

Posted on March 28, 2012, in Reviews, Video Games and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. 4 Comments.

  1. I loved this game. While I do wish they still had the seperate co-op campaign, I have had a blast trying to conquer the survival mode (only got to wave 21 so far). I like how you can unlock new characters by doing certain stuff too. Overall I liked Shank 2 a bit better than the first. Both are pretty sweet. Kind of an underrated series this gen. Great review!

  2. What did you think of Scott Pilgrim, or Castle Crashers? Those seemed pretty solid entries in the genre, too, thought very different than (what I assume) Shank is.

    If memory serves, Scotty P came out the same day as Shank…and with Tab’s love of River City Ransom, it was no contest which to buy.

    • Scott Pilgrim is amazing. Definitely occupies a different branch of the genre from Shank, but no less a high point. If it had online co-op it would have been perfect, I just don’t have 3 other people within a hundred miles of me to play it with.

      Castle Crashers is alright. Definitely not a bad game but I don’t understand the universal praise it gets. Other than the “cute plus ultraviolent” novelty factor, it feels pretty basic and button-mashy to me. I’ve never been able to get into playing it by myself.

      • I only watched people play Castle Crashers. It has the “loot factor” that only used to matter to Diablo players that now afflicts seeminly 85% of the games released anymore. It seemed decent enough.

        I never understood the lack of online co-op for Scotty P.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: